Can there be role of Philosophy towards the Progress of Science?

The answer to this question is “Yes and No”. More precise answer is “No and Yes”. No part is because Philosophers tend to transcend physical reality. They may or may not go to right side. Even if some of them reach to right destination of transcendent reality, their method is not suitable to study physical […]

To be Philosophical

To be Philosophical means looking things in totality. To have a totalitarian approach. Rather than focusing a particular problem, trying to understand overall general structure, scheme or theme. To have a systematic approach and unwillingness to accept any stance within that general scheme without having solid logical justification. This philosophical approach is good because non […]

‘Scientists’ are under delusion and they do think that Universe is ‘Governed’ by their theories.

After having seen that General Relativity (GR) has actually failed the test of Cosmos, now it is time to see that ‘scientists’ do think as if their beloved theories ‘govern’ the whole Universe. Examples are numerous but purpose of this blog post is not to present a great number of examples. It is quite general […]

“There is No Alternative to the Big Bang Cosmology” – a closed-minded argument of Big Bang Supporters

Supporters of Big Bang Cosmology often come up with this argument. Recently, a Philosopher of Science, Dr. Bjørn Ekeberg (PhD) published a Philosophic themed book from the platform of a reputed University that pointed out some problems of Big Bang Cosmology. The first response from the Big Bang Supporters that he faced was this title […]

Does Philosophy teach us anything?

Basically supporters of modern official science frequently raise this question only to make a point as if Philosophy actually cannot teach anything. The answer is that Philosophy teaches us our right limits. We do not claim to have hard knowledge of things beyond of our limits. With philosophy we find the logical boundary of any […]

Some indications of Pseudoscience in Theoretical Physics

Official Theoretical Physicists always blame any non-official stance on science matters as pseudoscience. However following clear indications of pseudoscience are common in official Theoretical Physics. 1- Out of proportion claims – We see redshifts and say “Universe is expanding”. 2- Claim to have sort out all the reality – like GR has the claim that […]

Newton, Theoretical Physics, Rationalism Philosophy and Natural Philosophy

Newton was Theoretical Physicist … (a point of view) Well, basically Newton was Natural Philosopher. English Translation title of his Principlia Mathematica is “The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”. Newton was not Theoretical Physicist. He was greatest Natural Philosopher however. While every Science or Philosophy must have to start from a point, The unique sign […]

Theoretical Physics is a form of Rationalism Philosophy:

Theoretical Physics is a form of Rationalism Philosophy. Rationalism is all about ‘deducing’ details of reality from first principles. In today’s Theoretical Physics, certain ‘first principles’ or ‘frameworks’ (GR and QM) have been worked out. Here ‘logical deduction’ part has been replaced by ‘Mathematical Derivation’. There is no essential difference between deduction and derivation. Essentially, […]

Philosophical Approach Vs. Contemporary ‘Scientific’ Approach

Present day science — specifically Theoretical Physics is based on body of knowledge and rigid frameworks already worked out by various scientists during the last hundred years. New scientist is required to take start from the point where previous scientists had reached. This system, by and large, works on trust that overall body of knowledge […]